<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Compilers on Aditya Kurniawan (Akur)</title><link>https://akurniawan.github.io/tags/compilers/</link><description>Recent content in Compilers on Aditya Kurniawan (Akur)</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://akurniawan.github.io/tags/compilers/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>I Set Out to Learn NRVO and Ended Up Measuring My Command Line</title><link>https://akurniawan.github.io/posts/return-std-move-costs-instructions-not-cycles/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2026 00:00:00 +0700</pubDate><guid>https://akurniawan.github.io/posts/return-std-move-costs-instructions-not-cycles/</guid><description>I wanted to understand named return value optimisation, got curious what the pessimised version costs, and my first numbers were reproducible to 0.01% and wrong. Instructions and cycles instead of wall-clock, and the pointer question turned out to be an allocator question.</description></item></channel></rss>